Is Meta Platforms a good long-term investment?
If you can find a fortune teller bold enough to share their secrets, they’ll probably tell you that predicting the future has less to do with what's inside their crystal ball than with what you see around you. The same is true for investing. While crystal balls belong at state fairs, successful ...
Overview
If you can find a fortune teller bold enough to share their secrets, they’ll probably tell you that predicting the future has less to do with what's inside their crystal ball than with what you see around you.
The same is true for investing. While crystal balls belong at state fairs, successful long-term investing has always been less about magic than observation. Investors who pay attention to the clues companies are signaling today will make better-informed decisions about tomorrow.
So when it comes to evaluating whether Meta Platforms is a compelling long-term buy, investors should look at the company's SEC filings and earnings transcripts instead of the “noise” on Wall Street.
These documents provide clues about Meta’s capital allocation, profitability, and progress toward AI monetization — factors that could foretell more about its long-term prospects than day-to-day share-price movements ever could.
Here are four questions relating to valuation, budget, spending, and artificial intelligence initiatives that investors should consider to help them read between the lines of Meta's headlines.
Is the 'bad news' priced into Meta’s valuation?
Valuation is a very important metric for investors to examine. A forward price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio measures how much investors are paying today for a company’s expected earnings over the next year. But it isn't just a measure of value. It can also reveal how optimistic or pessimistic the market has become, and that’s certainly been the case with Meta.
For much of 2026, the market has treated Meta as if it’s recklessly spending cash. After its first-quarter earnings release, when it raised its AI-related capital expenditure guidance, shares fell roughly 15%.
Following the sell-off, Meta traded at a forward P/E of roughly 17 to 20 times earnings — a modest valuation for a company reporting robust 33% year-over-year revenue growth.
Compared with many of its Mag 7 brethren, that multiple suggests investors are staying cautious about Meta's AI spending — despite CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s confidence in the company's long-term outlook.
Zuckerberg has argued that AI “will improve all our existing systems,” while enabling “the creation and discovery of new things that aren't imaginable today.” The challenge for investors is determining whether these once-in-a-lifetime opportunities will generate returns that justify the expense.
@hostingeracademy Meta launched its new AI tool Muse Spark✨ Honestly, it might have potential to be the best AI tool of 2026 as it’s built to actually see the world, so for example, you can point your camera at your fridge for instant recipes or nutrition info. 🥗 For business owners, it’s easily the best AI tool for sales because it acts as a personal stylist for your customers on Instagram and Facebook, making discovery feel natural instead of like an ad.💰 If you're looking for the best AI tool to build a business website, check out Hostinger Horizons—it builds your whole site from just one prompt. 🌐✨ Try it here 👉 bit.ly/METAMUSE Use coupon code TIKTOK for 10% OFF! #bestaitool #aitools #ai #metaai #musespark
♬ original sound - Hostinger Academy
Can Meta afford its AI ambitions?
Wall Street initially punished Meta for its massive 2026 capital expenditure budget of $125 billion to $145 billion, viewing the spending as pure cost with little ROI to show for it.
But Meta’s first-quarter earnings offered investors an important reminder: It is an advertising company investing in AI — not an AI company in search of a business model.
Meta’s total revenue was up 33% to $56.3 billion, thanks to a 12% increase in ad pricing. The company generated an industry-leading 41% operating margin, giving it the flexibility to absorb the upfront costs of building the very specialized infrastructure AI requires. It ended the quarter with $81 billion in cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities, along with $12.4 billion in free cash flow.
These figures suggest a “fortress-like” balance sheet — not a company taking too big of a bite.
Is Meta investing — or merely spending?
Investors have good reason to be cautious. They have seen this movie before.
Details
Zuckerberg’s “metaverse” ambitions were once envisioned as the company’s next big thing and potentially a successor to social networking in general: an immersive, 3D realm where people could socialize, work, and play, all accessed through virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) headsets.
But while Meta’s Reality Labs division spent an estimated $70 billion to $80 billion on developing the technology, the metaverse failed to achieve widespread consumer adoption.
Critics of Meta’s AI capex investments pointed to the metaverse as a warning. But there’s one notable difference between the two: Meta’s AI investments are already playing a role in its core advertising business.
AI-powered recommendation systems are improving Meta’s engagement, while its AI tools are helping advertisers create and optimize campaigns.
The real question remains: Will these investments generate returns higher than their costs?
Is Meta already proving AI can generate new revenue?
With the launch of Muse Spark 1.1 on July 9, 2026, investors received another clue about Meta’s AI strategy.
The multimodal reasoning model is built for agentic tasks and showcases advancements in autonomous coding and computer use. “This release brings us closer to our vision of personal superintelligence,” Meta’s press release stated, “models that help you pursue your goals, create what you imagine, deepen your relationships, and take action on what you value most.”
It also provides a glimpse into how Meta could monetize its agentic AI beyond its advertising business.
Now Meta must prove that this technology can move beyond “wow”-worthy demonstrations and gain widespread use among developers and businesses. For long-term investors, that may be the most important clue to watch next.
More on tech stocks:
- Nvidia’s stock split history: Everything you need to know
- AMD’s stock buybacks explained: History, balance & outlook
- Does Intel pay dividends? History & future prospects explained
How is Meta’s stock rated by analysts?
Meta’s stock is rated a hold, or number 3 rank, by Zacks Investment Research, which is a Chicago-based investment research firm that compiles analyst ratings and earnings estimates. The recommendation suggests a neutral position on the stock.
The rating indicates that, for investors who own Meta shares, there’s no recommendation to either buy more stock or sell any shares at the moment. “Stocks in this camp can still provide excellent upside potential. But one needs to keep a careful eye on these stocks,” according to Zacks.
Zacks recommends investors focus on stocks that are ranked 1, or strong buy, and to an extent, those ranked 2. On the other hand, stocks that are rated 4 or 5 should typically be avoided.
How has Meta’s stock performed?
Meta’s stock has risen significantly and outperformed the market since its initial public offering of $38 a share in May 2012. The stock gained 16.6 times its IPO price through its July 10, 2026, closing price of $669.21. By comparison, the S&P 500 Index posted a nearly fivefold increase in the same period.
Meta's stock tumbled in 2022 amid concerns of heavy spending on its metaverse initiative. Since then, however, shares climbed more than sevenfold, driven in part by a return to focus on advertising revenue and a pivot to artificial intelligence.
Google Finance via Google Sheets
Source
Originally published at www.thestreet.com.
